Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site tolerant.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!bellcore!decvax!ittatc!dcdwest!sdcsvax!ucbvax!hplabs!oliveb!tolerant!kathy
From: kathy@tolerant.UUCP (Kathy Kister)
Newsgroups: net.singles,net.women
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Why male dominance?
Message-ID: <296@tolerant.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 6-Mar-86 18:53:43 EST
Article-I.D.: tolerant.296
Posted: Thu Mar  6 18:53:43 1986
Date-Received: Sun, 9-Mar-86 00:42:18 EST
References: <1270@decwrl.DEC.COM> <134@rtech.UUCP> <4570@mhuxd.UUCP> <293@tolerant.UUCP>
Organization: Tolerant Systems, Inc.  San Jose, CA
Lines: 14
Xref: watmath net.singles:10785 net.women:9610

> > > > 
> > > > How do you account for the evolution of this male dominance?
> > > > 				Seth Jackson
> > > 
> >It doesn't help matters that men believe that only male offspring can carry
> on the family blood line and that the female don't count.  I would have thought
> that everyone was past this, but I am constantly surprised by the number of
> idiots (particularly, my fater-in-law) who believe this.  Generally, only
> the male carries the family name and is the only way to insure "immorality".
 
Well, I really meant immortality, and you know it.  But it was good for a laugh,
wouldn't you agree?
:wq
>