Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site stolaf.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxn!ihnp4!stolaf!flackc From: flackc@stolaf.UUCP (Chap Flack) Newsgroups: net.singles Subject: Re: Saying no (really misunderstanding) Message-ID: <5139@stolaf.UUCP> Date: Fri, 7-Mar-86 18:21:33 EST Article-I.D.: stolaf.5139 Posted: Fri Mar 7 18:21:33 1986 Date-Received: Tue, 11-Mar-86 00:26:29 EST References: <1369@osu-eddie.UUCP> <3286@sun.uucp> <686@rti-sel.UUCP> <10179@amdcad.UUCP> Organization: Carleton College, Northfield, MN Lines: 30 > In article <686@rti-sel.UUCP> wfi@rti-sel.UUCP (William Ingogly) writes: > >Let me put it this way. There's a couple living next door who you have > >absolutely no interest in sexually. But they seem like nice enough > >people, so you decide to ask them over for dinner. You get four "Gee, > >thanks, but we're washing our hair" responses in a row. Are you > >inclined to ask them over for dinner again? > > But that is the difference, that you are interested in a person sexually. This reminds me, indirectly, of my favorite problem. I tend to be busy enough that if I meet people who interest me *as friends*, unless they happen to be working very closely with me, I will never get to know them without arranging to spend more time with them--i.e., asking them out. So I do this pretty often, and it *hardly ever* means that I have a sexual interest (which in me never seems to develop until I've known someone for a while, and that's the way I like it). I suspect that a number of women who have turned me down did so because they misunderstood why I was asking. (I try to be clear, but I'll admit I've never opened with "Look, I'm *not* interested in you sexually...." |-{ ) I have, sometimes, explained very clearly later, which gets widely varying reactions. Anybody have any thoughts on this? -- --------------------- Chap Flack ihnp4!stolaf!agnes!flackc Carleton College ihnp4!stolaf!flackc Northfield, MN 55057