Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site cuuxb.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!cuae2!ltuxa!cuuxb!frye
From: frye@cuuxb.UUCP (frye)
Newsgroups: net.singles
Subject: Reply to Ingogly's reply...Yeh, another reply to a reply.
Message-ID: <463@cuuxb.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 14-Mar-86 15:03:49 EST
Article-I.D.: cuuxb.463
Posted: Fri Mar 14 15:03:49 1986
Date-Received: Sun, 16-Mar-86 08:51:27 EST
Distribution: net
Organization: AT&T-IS, Customer Support, Lisle, Il.
Lines: 28

I agree with most of your observations, Bill. I thought that
the original poster meant male to female comparison in people
vs. male to female comparison in other mammals. Some folks don't 
get to study bone and muscle structure in other mammals, but
they do get to study their mate's/SO's bodies.

What I was getting at is the different shapes of the male and
female human bodies. A woman's hormonal metabolish will usually
cause her system to produce a little more insulin that the male
hormonal metabolism does. That will cause a little more body fat
to be formed. The bone and muscle structures aren't that different,
but we are not covered with hair like horses, 'possums(8-) and
other hairy beasties. The hair covering might reveal more dif-
ference than we ordinarily see if removed. Like I said before
though, I really don't feel like shaving a pair of apes or horses
to find out(8-). But, to do so might reveal that women and men are
no more different that males and females of other species of critters.

Ummm, 10-4 on that there screwup, Bill. I think so it was a Freudian
slip er sumpthin"(8-). It got by my wary eye somehow. I musta blinked.
Be careful though, there are a few kinkdoms in existance. I think Ol'
Bird Dog lives in one of 'em(8-).




Have a happy weekend if you can swing it.
Grizzly