Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: Notesfiles $Revision: 1.7.0.10 $; site uokvax.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!okstate.UUCP!uokvax.UUCP!emjej
From: emjej@uokvax.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.singles
Subject: Re: More on love songs.
Message-ID: <5500030@uokvax.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 20-Mar-86 20:56:00 EST
Article-I.D.: uokvax.5500030
Posted: Thu Mar 20 20:56:00 1986
Date-Received: Sat, 22-Mar-86 22:47:55 EST
References: <465@cuuxb.UUCP>
Lines: 18
Nf-ID: #R:cuuxb.UUCP:465:uokvax.UUCP:5500030:000:711
Nf-From: uokvax.UUCP!emjej    Mar 20 19:56:00 1986


Actually, her face must've been in pretty bad shape just after the tenth
ship got launched, much less the thousandth...ouch! :-)

Listening to Bread always OD'd me on syrup--of course, it may well be that
I can prove every true theorem in my formal system because I'm HIGHLY in-
consistent in that respect!  I bridle at the sentimentality of most popular
love songs, not to mention sappy 19th-century lieder, but I adore 14th-
century courtly love songs.

	"Sweet, beautiful lady,
	 For God's sake don't think
	    that anyone has dominion over my heart
	    save you alone..." etc. (Machaut's "Douce Dame Jolie")

				Think of "fa la la" as the Renaissance
				version of "yeah, yeah, yeah"...
				James Jones