Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: Notesfiles $Revision: 1.7.0.10 $; site uokvax.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!okstate.UUCP!uokvax.UUCP!emjej
From: emjej@uokvax.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.singles
Subject: Re: Tan Lines...
Message-ID: <5500028@uokvax.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 20-Mar-86 20:41:00 EST
Article-I.D.: uokvax.5500028
Posted: Thu Mar 20 20:41:00 1986
Date-Received: Sat, 22-Mar-86 22:48:21 EST
References: <129@itcatl.UUCP>
Lines: 17
Nf-ID: #R:itcatl.UUCP:129:uokvax.UUCP:5500028:000:892
Nf-From: uokvax.UUCP!emjej    Mar 20 19:41:00 1986


/* Written 11:25 am  Mar 17, 1986 by parris@itcatl.UUCP in net.singles */
My boss (or should I say coworker?) and I were having a disagreement
concerning tan lines.  I think they are sexy...  He disagrees.  What 
do you people out in net.land think?
/* End of text from net.singles */

I can't say that I have an opinion one way or another.  I *do* have a
theory, though...I guess borrowed from the fellow who did the costumes
for *Star Trek*, if I correctly remember a book read long ago.  Perhaps
he was trying to maximize titillation instead of sexiness, whatever *that*
actually means...But clothing has whatever attribute it is to the extent
that it renders it likely (but not certain) that one will see some portion
of the body not usually exposed.  I would guess that tan lines are
evidence that one is indeed "seeing what one oughtn't."

				James (not the voice of experience) Jones