Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!ucbvax!space From: dsmith@HPLABSC (David Smith) Newsgroups: net.space Subject: Re: Scramjets Message-ID: <8603061937.AA23798@hplabsc> Date: Thu, 6-Mar-86 14:37:22 EST Article-I.D.: hplabsc.8603061937.AA23798 Posted: Thu Mar 6 14:37:22 1986 Date-Received: Sat, 8-Mar-86 04:56:37 EST Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Organization: The ARPA Internet Lines: 32 > Specific impulse is often erroneously specified in "seconds"; the correct > units should be "meters/sec", i.e., velocity. The error occurs because Isp > is usually defined in English units as > pounds-force of thrust x seconds > -------------------------------- > pounds-mass of propellant > and somebody made the mistake of "cancelling out" the pounds-force factor > with the pounds-mass factor. A good example of how the English system of > measurements befuddles thinking, but I digress... > In metric units, things are much clearer: > newtons of thrust x seconds > --------------------------- > kilograms of propellant > Since a newton is the force required to accelerate 1 kg by 1 meter/sec^2, it > has dimensions Kg-m/sec^2. When the other factors are included, this all > reduces to meters/second. > This way of expressing specific impulse has a much more elegant and > straightforward meaning: it is simply the velocity of the rocket exhaust > relative to the rocket. This is true enough, but note that the metric system is abused almost as frequently as the English system. The above English abuse is in using pounds-mass instead of slugs. The usual corresponding metric abuse is in using kilograms-force. So often we see jet and rocket engines rated in kilograms of thrust; or specific fuel consumption (inverse of specific impulse) as kilograms (mass) per kilogram (force) per hour. Phonograph needle tracking forces are rated in grams. David Smith hplabs!dsmith dsmith%hp-labs@csnet-relay