Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: Notesfiles $Revision: 1.7.0.10 $; site ism780 Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!bellcore!decvax!ittatc!dcdwest!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!ism780c!ism780!jimb From: jimb@ism780 Newsgroups: net.space Subject: Re: It could have been worse. Message-ID: <60000003@ism780> Date: Sat, 8-Mar-86 18:55:00 EST Article-I.D.: ism780.60000003 Posted: Sat Mar 8 18:55:00 1986 Date-Received: Tue, 11-Mar-86 01:36:09 EST References: <678780@<860222195435> Lines: 42 Nf-ID: #R:<860222195435:678780:ism780:60000003:000:2061 Nf-From: ism780!jimb Mar 8 15:55:00 1986 >> But the thing I find most offensive about this posting is the slam >> against people with liberal arts backgrounds. Perhaps some of the >> semi-literate chemists and physicists I've known can study their >> culture, instead of taking classes on overspecialized topics that tell >> them nothing about why they're narrow-minded, asocial, and incapable >> of communication. Liberal arts bigotry is as ridiculous and offensive >> as hard science bigotry, n'est-ce pas? Sheesh. > While it is uncommon to cross the two cultures, it is usually the > scientist who tries/succeeds. > = Bill Ingogly >> = Matthew P. Weiner Bullsh*t! As someone who is more-or-less tri-cultural (hard science, social science, the arts), I find that tolerance/acceptance/understanding across the chasms is pretty low all the way around. But in general, more of the liberal arts types will admit that they don't understand scientific/technical points of view and are willing to be educated. More "techies" either *think* they have a superior understanding of social sciences/liberal arts or discount it as meaningless. (The pure arts people seem to be in their own world; even I have trouble relating to some of them.) A side consideration is what society values and labels intelligence. At this point in history, math and verbal skills are "in," leaving people with other kinds of intelligence sucking hind tit. The "techies" dominate in the math-oriented skills and the liberal arts types dominate in the verbal, leading to all sorts of "Tastes great! Less filling!" confrontations. Personally, I benefit from this; my abilities are such that I move among both groups with moderate ease and I earn a very decent living essentially acting as an intepreter between the two groups. From a more distant perspective, though, "Feh!" Society is the less for the division and many individuals are poorer for it in terms of unfulfilled potential. -- from the musings of Jim Brunet ima/ihnp4/ism780 hplabs/hao/ico/ism780 sdcsvax/sdcrdcf/ism780