Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!epsilon!zeta!sabre!petrus!bellcore!decvax!ittatc!dcdwest!sdcsvax!ucbvax!BROWNVM.BITNET!ST401385
From: ST401385@BROWNVM.BITNET
Newsgroups: net.space
Subject: (1) Fusion  (2) Olber's Paradox
Message-ID: <8603092209.AA25929@s1-b.arpa>
Date: Sun, 9-Mar-86 16:20:25 EST
Article-I.D.: s1-b.8603092209.AA25929
Posted: Sun Mar  9 16:20:25 1986
Date-Received: Wed, 12-Mar-86 03:33:55 EST
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Organization: The ARPA Internet
Lines: 12


    The impression I've gotten from reading magazines such as
Technology Review is that, although scientific breakeven is probably
achievable in the near future, fusion reactors built on the outgrowth
of any of the current technology paths would be huge, expensive,
unwieldy, have extremely low power densities, become rapidly radioactive
due to stray neutron flux, and produce electricity only at exorbitantly
high cost.
     I'd like to believe in fusion, but it doesn't sound good so far.

Olber's paradox:
I'm getting a bit tired of the discussion of Olber's paradox.