Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 alpha 4/15/85; site sci.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!bellcore!decvax!decwrl!amdcad!cae780!weitek!sci!daver From: daver@sci.UUCP (Dave Rickel) Newsgroups: net.startrek Subject: Re: The World of Startrek--David Gerrold Message-ID: <152@sci.UUCP> Date: Sat, 8-Mar-86 21:41:12 EST Article-I.D.: sci.152 Posted: Sat Mar 8 21:41:12 1986 Date-Received: Wed, 12-Mar-86 21:54:53 EST References: <65@utecfc.UUCP> <755@ihwpt.UUCP> Organization: Silicon Compilers, Inc., San Jose, CA Lines: 38 More akin to the transporter breakdowns. Recently, one of our PBS stations has been airing a british "sf" (term is a bit dubious--there is less science in the series than in Star Trek (or even Dr. Who). For instance, they seem to have no idea of what a galaxy is) series called Blakes 7. They also have a transporter (called, in this case, a teleporter). People who are supposed to be beamed up or down must wear teleporter bracelets. It is a bit disappointing to find out that the british can't write any better than the americans--in every other episode (rough statistics) the crew beams down, gets conked over the head, and has their teleport bracelets removed. I remember wondering when I saw the third or fourth show (when they introduced the teleporter) how they were going to avoid the Star Trek transporter problem. The answer, of course, is that they weren't--they were going to discover the problem (and the same cheap solutions) for themselves. What makes the thing even more annoying is that neither the intelligent nor the paranoid crewperson has taken the obvious step of bringing along a backup (say worn around the ankle inside their flashy boots) (and noone ever thinks of bringing along a backup weapon, but i guess that would be cheating). In a similar vein, the only time i remember the Enterprise personnel being intelligent and bringing along a backup locator facility was in the Nazi episode (Patterns of Force?), and, of course, they weren't used for that, but to make a silly laser to blast the lock out of the cell. By the was, has anyone bothered calculating how much energy was produced by the laser? I think its power source was a 40 watt or thereabouts bulb. It was intercepting maybe 1% of that--a .4 watt laser? call it 400 mW. Sounds a bit more impressive. How long would it take a 400 mW laser to cut through a link on a pair of handcuffs, or to cut through a lock? It would seem that the beam would have to be much more concentrated than it was shown--less than .01 mm in diameter, at a guess. Probably much less. Hmm. I seem to remember something about a laser beacon in a different show. Sound familiar? Of course, it didn't work. david rickel