Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site vax135.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!vax135!miles
From: miles@vax135.UUCP (Miles Murdocca)
Newsgroups: net.suicide
Subject: Re: Painless Suicide Methods: Are we discussing an illegal topic?
Message-ID: <1326@vax135.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 13-Mar-86 08:45:18 EST
Article-I.D.: vax135.1326
Posted: Thu Mar 13 08:45:18 1986
Date-Received: Sat, 15-Mar-86 02:26:56 EST
References: <1216@udenva.UUCP>
Organization: AT&T Bell Labs, Holmdel, NJ
Lines: 26

>This discussion of painless suicide methods has gotten unnerving to me.
>I know there was a *big* discussion recently on "should it be legal?"

>3) Net policy forbids both requests and responses as to information
>on *how to perform illegal acts*.  (I am not trying to net.admin
>here.  See below.  For now, please take it that I am *stating a fact*
>and leave it at that....)

Don't get bent out of shape about the discussion.  It's all been academic
so far.

I can't think of a method of suicide that is totally painless, including
death while unconcsious because there will probably be stress involved
until one goes under (no pun intended).  I would guess that the
schizophrenics have it easy.  Half the mind could decide on suicide
without the other half knowing anything about it.  My suggestion to
the original poster is to go crazy first and then you'll have nothing
to worry about.

	Roses are red,
	Viloets are blue;
	I'm schizophrenic,
	And I am too.

    Miles Murdocca, 4G-538, AT&T Bell Laboratories, Crawfords Corner Rd,
    Holmdel, NJ, 07733, (201) 949-2504, ...{ihnp4}!vax135!miles