Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site amdahl.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!bellcore!decvax!decwrl!amdcad!amdahl!andrew From: andrew@amdahl.UUCP (Andrew Sharpe) Newsgroups: net.unix-wizards Subject: shell layers discussion Message-ID: <2906@amdahl.UUCP> Date: Wed, 12-Mar-86 18:38:19 EST Article-I.D.: amdahl.2906 Posted: Wed Mar 12 18:38:19 1986 Date-Received: Fri, 14-Mar-86 07:29:37 EST References: <67@cstvax.UUCP> <2864@amdahl.UUCP> <194@rexago1.UUCP> Distribution: net Organization: Amdahl Corp, Sunnyvale CA Lines: 26 Keywords: SYSV sxt shl Summary: shl In article <194@rexago1.UUCP>, rich@rexago1.UUCP (K. Richard Magill) writes: > In article <2864@amdahl.UUCP> andrew@amdahl.UUCP (Andrew Sharpe) writes: > >In article <67@cstvax.UUCP>, scott@cstvax.UUCP (Scott Larnach) writes: > >> The one and only real thing which bugs me about system V is the > >> total lack of job control. > >Uhh, excuse me, but what about shell layers ( shl ) ? It does not > >give you job control, per se, but it does allow you to break out > >of a foreground process, to 'do something else'. > > So long as you have ksh, whose sxt job control crashes machines, I beg to differ, but I run shl with the ksh, and have no problems whatsoever. If your machine crashes with shl and ksh, well, I would take a look at your *particular* port of UNIX. It is not fair to blame AT&T for bugs that porters added. -- Andrew Sharpe ...!{ihnp4,cbosgd,hplabs}!amdahl!andrew ***************************************** ___________ * The views expressed above are solely * ,/| _____ | * my cat's opinions, and do not reflect * | | |___ /| | * the views of the employees, nor the * | | | | | | * management, of Amdahl Corporation. * | | | | | | * * | | |__| | | * * | | / | | ,| * * | ~~~~~ |/ ***************************************** ~~~~~~~~~~~