Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site fritz.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!decwrl!pyramid!hplabs!oliveb!felix!fritz!zemon From: zemon@fritz.UUCP (Art Zemon) Newsgroups: net.lang.mod2 Subject: Re: Misc. Message-ID: <616@fritz.UUCP> Date: Wed, 9-Apr-86 15:34:50 EST Article-I.D.: fritz.616 Posted: Wed Apr 9 15:34:50 1986 Date-Received: Fri, 11-Apr-86 20:46:15 EST References: <8604021130.3020@ur-cayuga.rochester.arpa> Reply-To: zemon@fritz.UUCP (Art zemon) Organization: FileNet Corp., Costa Mesa, CA Lines: 21 In article <8604021130.3020@ur-cayuga.rochester.arpa> XBR2D96D@DDATHD21.BITNET writes: > >4.) Has anybody experience with LOGITECH MSDOS Modula-2 vs. a product > called M2SDS. It's manufactured by "Interface Technologies Corp."? I have a copy of M2SDS and am pretty happy with it. I purchased it because I wanted an inexpensive way to learn about the language. M2SDS is just that. Debugging support is nonexistent unless you spend another $80. (The original package only cost ~$50.) The editor has a few bugs. On the other hand, it is reasonable quick and easy to work with. It generates fast and correct code. For a learning tool, who can ask more? From the things I have heard about Logitech's product, it sounds significantly better. It you want to write "real" programs then I would hesitate to recommend M2SDS. If you want to play then buy the less expensive M2SDS. -- -- Art Zemon FileNet Corp. ...! {decvax, ihnp4, ucbvax} !trwrb!felix!zemon