Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!ucbvax!phr
From: phr@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU (Paul Rubin)
Newsgroups: net.math
Subject: Re: P = NP Article
Message-ID: <12663@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU>
Date: Tue, 25-Mar-86 20:16:18 EST
Article-I.D.: ucbvax.12663
Posted: Tue Mar 25 20:16:18 1986
Date-Received: Thu, 27-Mar-86 01:23:21 EST
References: <729@uwvax.UUCP>
Reply-To: phr@ucbvax.berkeley.edu.UUCP (Paul Rubin)
Organization: University of California at Berkeley
Lines: 4
Summary: the proof appears to be flawed.

R. Solovay has apparently found a fatal flaw in Swart's paper (a
`proof by example' of a lemma that Solovay doesn't believe to be
true).  Solovay has written Swart asking if Swart can fix the bug.
This info was posted on msgs here by E. L. Lawler.