Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site gargoyle.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!cbosgd!ihnp4!gargoyle!west
From: west@gargoyle.UUCP (Steve Westfall)
Newsgroups: net.micro,net.news.group
Subject: Re: Wanted: net.micro.xenix
Message-ID: <387@gargoyle.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 25-Mar-86 00:54:56 EST
Article-I.D.: gargoyle.387
Posted: Tue Mar 25 00:54:56 1986
Date-Received: Wed, 26-Mar-86 07:07:03 EST
References: <950@rlgvax.UUCP>
Reply-To: west@gargoyle.UUCP (Steve Westfall)
Organization: U. of Chicago Graduate School of Business
Lines: 16
Xref: watmath net.micro:14126 net.news.group:5293
Summary: "No" Vote

In article <950@rlgvax.UUCP> dennis@rlgvax.UUCP (Dennis Bednar) writes:
>
>How about a new group "net.micro.xenix" for Xenix 286/System 5 for
>the PC/AT?  The problem with net.micro.pc, is that its full of
>stuff for pc/mdos machines.

It seems to me that Xenix is adequately covered in the several
groups where Unix is discussed (net.unix, net.unix.wizards, etc.).
(And even if there were to be a net.micro.xenix, why limit it to
Xenix on the PC/AT?  More people run Xenix on Tandy and Altos
machines than on AT's!)


Steve Westfall		      uucp:    ihnp4!gargoyle!west
Univ. of Chicago
Graduate School of Business