Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!princeton!orsvax1!pyrnj!caip!seismo!lll-crg!lll-lcc!qantel!ptsfa!gilbbs!mc68020
From: mc68020@gilbbs.UUCP (Tom Keller)
Newsgroups: net.micro
Subject: Re: Wanted: net.micro.xenix
Message-ID: <121@gilbbs.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 26-Mar-86 20:04:17 EST
Article-I.D.: gilbbs.121
Posted: Wed Mar 26 20:04:17 1986
Date-Received: Sat, 29-Mar-86 01:31:06 EST
References: <950@rlgvax.UUCP> <176@transys.UUCP>
Organization: Gil's Place, Santa Rosa CA
Lines: 30
Summary: XENIX newsgroup needed...but let's not limit it too much

In article <176@transys.UUCP>, baron@transys.UUCP (Joe Portman) writes:
> > 
> > How about a new group "net.micro.xenix" for Xenix 286/System 5 for
> > the PC/AT?  The problem with net.micro.pc, is that its full of
> > stuff for pc/mdos machines.
> > -- 
> > -Dennis Bednar
> > {decvax,ihnp4,harpo,allegra}!seismo!rlgvax!dennis	UUCP
> 
> I am all for it.

   I am all for it as well.  But why limit the group to discussions of 
XENIX implemented on Intentionally Bad Machines?

   I run XENIX on a Tandy 6000, and there are at least 100000 other sout
there doing the same thing.

   Remember, *MOST* computers in the world are *NOT* IBMs, contrary to the
propaganda teh Inherently Bogus Machine company puts out.

-- 

====================================

Disclaimer:  I hereby disclaim any and all responsibility for disclaimers.

tom keller
{ihnp4, dual}!ptsfa!gilbbs!mc68020

(* we may not be big, but we're small! *)