Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site unc.unc.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxn!ihnp4!drutx!mtuxo!houxm!whuxl!whuxlm!akgua!mcnc!unc!southard
From: southard@unc.UUCP (Scott Southard)
Newsgroups: net.micro.amiga
Subject: Amiga Multi-Forth
Message-ID: <1345@unc.unc.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 16-Apr-86 17:26:32 EST
Article-I.D.: unc.1345
Posted: Wed Apr 16 17:26:32 1986
Date-Received: Sat, 19-Apr-86 08:23:51 EST
Distribution: net
Organization: CS Dept, U. of N. Carolina, Chapel Hill
Lines: 8

I recently saw some benchmarks comparing CSI Amiga Multi-Forth to Aztec &
Lattice C on CompuServe.  I only glanced at the note, so I'm not sure about
the results (speed and code size), but it seemed that Forth came out ahead in
several areas.  I'm considering buying CSI's package soon, so I'd like to know
if anyone has done similar comparisons.  Also, please specify whether you are
using the Forth interpreter or compiler (results using both are preferable).
thanks,
brent