Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 Apollo 11/21/85; site apollo.uucp Path: utzoo!decvax!wanginst!apollo!nazgul From: nazgul@apollo.uucp (Kee Hinckley) Newsgroups: net.micro.apple Subject: Re: Aztec C, Information Request Message-ID: <2cb60b4f.7005@apollo.uucp> Date: Tue, 25-Mar-86 17:40:12 EST Article-I.D.: apollo.2cb60b4f.7005 Posted: Tue Mar 25 17:40:12 1986 Date-Received: Wed, 26-Mar-86 19:49:18 EST References: <853@alberta.UUCP> <2006@brl-smoke.ARPA> Reply-To: nazgul@apollo.UUCP (Kee Hinckley) Distribution: na Organization: Apollo Computer Inc., Chelmsford MA Lines: 58 Summary: In article <2006@brl-smoke.ARPA> gwyn@brl.ARPA writes: > In article <853@alberta.UUCP> gordon@alberta.UUCP (Gordon Atwood) writes: > >I would like to obtain as much data as possible on Aztec C, produced by Manx > >Corporation. Details of other C compilers would also be appreciated. > For real speed I directly access peripheral registers > rather than sending I/O through the standard I/O hooks. And if you really want to cruise, you can always talk to the screen directly! > The ProDOS version is supposed to eventually have support > for cross-development of DOS 3.3 target applications. They have that out in beta now, but I haven't tried it yet. > > 4) Compatibility with "Standard C" [whatever that may be], (I prefer as close > > to Kernighan as possible). > Aztec C is very close to K&R, and the ProDOS version > includes later features a la X3J11. Floating-point > support IS provided. Bit-fields were missing last I > looked. The library is closer to 7th Ed. UNIX than > to X3J11 or the SVID; this can be fixed easily enough. Bit fields are in the new prodos version (least-wise the latest update warned that arithmetic with bit fields didn't work yet, which I assume means that bit-fields are there!) > > 6) Any other information that will help in my making a decision concerning > > the purchase of this Package. > The ProDOS version is taking much longer to get to the > release point than Manx at first indicated. I get the > feeling that Jim Goodnow is their main developer and > he has been busy getting Mac & Amiga releases ready. > I've found the compiler itself to be pretty reliable, > but the ProDOS shell is not ready for serious use yet. I agree with that. I doubt that the Apple ][ market is a major money maker for them, so it doesn't get priority. On the other hand the only other choice is the ORCA implementation of SmallC, which by their own admission is not a production system (but you do get the entire source code!). -nazgul -- ...decvax!wanginst!apollo!nazgul Little Bo-Peep Has lost her sheep, The radar has failed to find them. They'll all, face to face, Meet in parallel space, Preceeding their leaders behind them. A Space Child's Mother Goose