Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site tetra.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!drutx!mtuxo!houxm!mhuxt!mhuxr!ulysses!bellcore!decvax!ittatc!dcdwest!sdcsvax!noscvax!tetra!rupp
From: rupp@tetra.UUCP (William L. Rupp)
Newsgroups: net.micro.mac
Subject: Re: Survey on Future Macintosh Architectures  (repost)
Message-ID: <132@tetra.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 21-Mar-86 13:32:39 EST
Article-I.D.: tetra.132
Posted: Fri Mar 21 13:32:39 1986
Date-Received: Wed, 26-Mar-86 03:03:49 EST
References: <245@ccnysci.UUCP>
Reply-To: rupp@tetra.UUCP (William L. rupp)
Organization: Naval Ocean Systems Center, San Diego
Lines: 11

I find your questions and answers very interesting.  Since I am not
a hardware expert, I will not attempt to answer your questions myself, but
I have a question of my own.  You state "look what happened to the Apple ][ 
when CP/M came along".   I was under the impression that CP/M antedated
the Apple ][.  Perhaps you meant "look what happened to the Apple ][ when
the IBM PC came along".  As a matter of fact, Apple is still selling more
Apple //'s (e's and c's) than Macs, if I am not mistaken.  It is true that
the business market has been lost to IBM, but there still is an Apple ][
market, and software still being developed.  

I am an Apple // and Mac user, so I can see both sides of the issue.