Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site reed.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!bellcore!decvax!tektronix!reed!bart
From: bart@reed.UUCP (Bart Massey)
Newsgroups: net.micro.mac,net.news
Subject: net.sources vs. net.sources.mac (Re: Re: INFO-MAC Goodies...)
Message-ID: <2860@reed.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 22-Mar-86 03:52:55 EST
Article-I.D.: reed.2860
Posted: Sat Mar 22 03:52:55 1986
Date-Received: Wed, 26-Mar-86 03:15:19 EST
References: <183@axiom.UUCP> <367@unirot.UUCP> <445@Navajo.ARPA> <4326@dartvax.UUCP>
Organization: Reed College, Portland, Oregon
Lines: 28
Xref: watmath net.micro.mac:5247 net.news:4694

Wake up, folks!

> In article <445@Navajo.ARPA> berner@Navajo.UUCP (William Berner) writes:
> >In article <367@unirot.UUCP> liz@unirot.UUCP (Mamaliz ) writes:
> >>
> >>PLEASE do not x-post info-mac software to net.sources!!  I (and a number
> >>of other people I know about) have a large enough problem pruning the
> >>garbage out of net.sources.  We have limited disk space around here.
> >>
> >>liz
> >
> >Is this to say that all of the stuff posted to info-mac is garbage?  Or
> >are you worried about double-postings, or what?  Certainly it seems that
> >some of the utilities posted to info-mac would be worthy of posting to 
> >net.sources.
> 
> 
> Please send it.  I am mailed INFO-MAC regularly, and am always upset that the
> software mentioned is not availiable to me.  if it were posted to net.sources
> I would have access to some very useful sounding programs.  I assume that
> there would be no double-postings.

I've seen several responses like Mr. Berner's, and I think somebody's missed
the point of the original posting -- post mac stuff to net.sources.MAC, not
plain old net.sources ...

					Bart Massey
					..tektronix!reed!bart