Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!harvard!seismo!lll-crg!lll-lcc!ucdavis!ucbvax!kim.berkeley.edu!hamachi From: hamachi@KIM.BERKELEY.EDU (Gordon Hamachi) Newsgroups: net.micro.mac Subject: Another Set of Disk Benchmarks Message-ID: <8603252311.AA07791@kim.berkeley.edu> Date: Tue, 25-Mar-86 18:11:02 EST Article-I.D.: kim.8603252311.AA07791 Posted: Tue Mar 25 18:11:02 1986 Date-Received: Sun, 20-Apr-86 07:12:19 EST Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Organization: University of California at Berkeley Lines: 34 Here are more measurements using Brecher disk benchmark on a Mac+ with Apple's internal 800K floppy drive. HFS and MFS volumes seem to perform differently. Of course, your mileage may differ... >The benchmark consists of three parts: >(1) 100 reads of 32KB of data from the start of the volume; >(2) 100 writes of 32KB of data to the start of the volume; >(3) 40 iterations of: read one 512-byte block from an offset of 1MB, followed > by read of one 512-byte block from start of volume; >( times are in ticks, i.e., sixtieths of a second): > > Data transfer time Access Time > ------------------ > Reads Writes > Apple Internal 800K drive (1) 8719 11543 (7) Apple Internal 800K drive (2) 8324 11540 (7) Apple Internal 800K drive (3) 8032 10902 (7) Apple Internal 800K drive (4) 7844 10908 (7) >Tecmar MacDrive (5) 6017 6719 401 >DataFrame 20 1344 2233 487 >HyperDrive (6) 1586 1600 563 >MicahDrive 20 AT 507 508 528 400K RAM Disk 192 192 (7) > Notes: (1) Disk cache disabled, 400K MFS Volume (2) 96K disk cache, 400K MFS Volume (3) Disk cache disabled, 800K HFS Volume (4) 256K disk cache, 800K HFS Volume (5) 10MB Fixed (6) original 10MB unit with old controller and version 5.1 software (7) Volume to small to complete this test