Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site mit-trillian.MIT.EDU
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!mit-trillian!philipp
From: philipp@mit-trillian.MIT.EDU (Philip Prindeville)
Newsgroups: net.micro.pc,net.dcom
Subject: Re: TCP/IP for the IBM PC
Message-ID: <211@mit-trillian.MIT.EDU>
Date: Wed, 9-Apr-86 03:51:59 EST
Article-I.D.: mit-tril.211
Posted: Wed Apr  9 03:51:59 1986
Date-Received: Thu, 10-Apr-86 20:33:36 EST
References: <164@ur-tut.UUCP>
Reply-To: philipp@trillian.UUCP (Philip Prindeville)
Distribution: net
Organization: MIT, Project Athena, Cambridge, MA
Lines: 24
Xref: watmath net.micro.pc:7720 net.dcom:1800
Summary: What about MIT's TCP/IP????

In article <164@ur-tut.UUCP>, dunn@ur-tut.UUCP(Carl Dunn) writes:
> I'm looking for any implementations of TCP/IP for the IBM PC. I have heard
> that Carnegie-Mellon and Stanford are working on MIT's version.

Well, you could try MIT...

What do you mean _working on MIT's version_?  What's wrong with it?
Is it _broken_?

It was written by one of the people I work, I use it daily, and
have had no significant problems with it.

It is well written, extremely favourably priced, available in source
form for not much more than the cost of the binaries (still under $100),
and there are no royalties involved.

Also, we are about to release a new version with some bug fixes and
domain name service support.

Also, the name of it is _PC/IP_.

				-Philip

P.S.	MIT's not out to make a buck, so this can't be a product plug :=).