Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!bellcore!petrus!scherzo!allegra!mit-eddie!think!harvard!seismo!munnari!basser!aaec!frank
From: frank@aaec.OZ (Frank Crawford)
Newsgroups: net.news
Subject: Re: Groups in active file (was Re: more interim results)
Message-ID: <630@aaec.OZ>
Date: Thu, 3-Apr-86 20:42:53 EST
Article-I.D.: aaec.630
Posted: Thu Apr  3 20:42:53 1986
Date-Received: Tue, 8-Apr-86 06:17:24 EST
References: <5192@glacier.ARPA> <1994@hao.UUCP> <5249@glacier.ARPA> <2033@hao.UUCP>
Organization: Australian Atomic Energy Commission
Lines: 12
Summary: What about the checkgroup message?


	There is another point about dropping groups from the active file.
Doesn't the checkgroup message complain when a group is missing ('cause that
one of it's purposes)?

	When you get to somewhere like Australia which doesn't get a lot
of the less useful groups then you wouldn't really be able to get any
reasonable output.  I certainly don't want to try and pick which group I
really am missing from the hundreds that I can't get.

						Frank Crawford
						(frank@aaec.OZ)