Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!columbia!garfield!eppstein From: eppstein@garfield.columbia.edu (David Eppstein) Newsgroups: net.news,net.news.group Subject: more interim results from worldwide net readership poll Message-ID: <1425@garfield.columbia.edu> Date: Tue, 25-Mar-86 15:46:51 EST Article-I.D.: garfield.1425 Posted: Tue Mar 25 15:46:51 1986 Date-Received: Sun, 20-Apr-86 11:51:26 EST References: <5192@glacier.ARPA> <1994@hao.UUCP> <5249@glacier.ARPA> <1998@hao.UUCP> <1165@utcs.uucp> <5641@glacier.ARPA> Organization: Columbia University CS Department Lines: 29 In article <5641@glacier.ARPA> reid@glacier.UUCP (Brian Reid) writes: > ... The definition of "Person X reads group Y" is that person X's .newsrc > file shows that he has read (or marked as read) at least one message in > group Y that has not yet been expired. If "expire" is run with standard > options, this means that person X has read at least one message in that > newsgroup in the last two weeks. If your site expires more rapidly than two > weeks, then a more stringent test will be applied. This brings up a problem with this survey that I have been wondering about for a week or so. Some groups have very low volume, such that it is possible for no articles to be current in the group when the survey is run. If that were the case, the survey would show no readers when in fact many people may read the group. As a practical example, one of my favorite groups happens to be net.roots. We expire news weekly, and in many weeks there are no messages in net.roots. Yet I would object very strenuously to being called a non-reader of the group. A possible solution would be to also count people who have caught up entirely with a group even if there is no message left unexpired in that group. This would still have some inaccuracies, but they would perhaps be counterbalanced by the people who haven't yet bothered to unsubscribe to the groups because they are so low volume. Perhaps the survey already does this, but there is no indication of that in the included description. -- David Eppstein, eppstein@cs.columbia.edu, seismo!columbia!cs!eppstein (note that the garfield in my headers is *not* the one in the UUCP map)