Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83 based; site hounx.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxt!houxm!hounx!kort From: kort@hounx.UUCP (B.KORT) Newsgroups: net.puzzle,net.philosophy Subject: Re: rational behavior Message-ID: <755@hounx.UUCP> Date: Tue, 25-Mar-86 07:58:22 EST Article-I.D.: hounx.755 Posted: Tue Mar 25 07:58:22 1986 Date-Received: Wed, 26-Mar-86 07:17:08 EST References: <12518@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU> <12539@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU> <738@hounx.UUCP>, <533@umich.UUCP> Organization: AT&T Bell Labs, Holmdel NJ Lines: 25 Xref: watmath net.puzzle:1562 net.philosophy:4661 Summary: (was "Re: Newcomb's Paradox") Paul Torek joins the discussion on specifying the prescription for "rational behavior"... >> What *exactly* do we mean by completely rational behavior? [Kort] >We mean, behavior that follows the norms of reason. Some examples: modus >ponens and the law of non-contradiction are norms of reason. Somewhat >more controversially, the principle "maximize subjective expected utility" >is a norm of reason. Still more controversial are norms for the formation >of "expectation" in this sense (i.e., probability judgements) and "utility" >functions (i.e., value systems). Is it not the case that the "norms of reason" are not only controversial, they have evolved steadily over historical times, with major and lasting contributions from many times and cultures? Even today, we see such contributions as Axelrod's work on the Evolution of Cooperation, and new branches of Logic such as Combinatorial Logic, Frege Logic, and the like (or dislike). Is it not the case that each generation of philosophers found a dilemma in the preceding structure, and resolved it by enlarging the dimensionality of the space in which the philosophical structure resided? (Example: Law of the Excluded Middle. We now have propositions which are formally undecidable as True or False. They have "truth-value" somewhere in betweens, as in Fuzzy Logic.) --Barry Kort ...ihnp4!hounx!kort