Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxn!mhuxm!mhuxf!mhuxi!mhuhk!mhuxt!houxm!whuxl!whuxlm!akgua!gatech!seismo!cmcl2!lanl!jlg
From: jlg@lanl.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.physics
Subject: Re: Bogus physics reamplified
Message-ID: <1082@lanl.ARPA>
Date: Fri, 28-Mar-86 14:51:14 EST
Article-I.D.: lanl.1082
Posted: Fri Mar 28 14:51:14 1986
Date-Received: Tue, 1-Apr-86 06:45:48 EST
References: <368@ihnet.UUCP> <2057@jhunix.UUCP> <2874@sjuvax.UUCP>
Reply-To: jlg@a.UUCP (Jim Giles)
Distribution: net
Organization: Los Alamos National Laboratory
Lines: 10
Keywords: general relativity, justifying assertions, name-calling

In article <12702@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU> weemba@brahms.UUCP (Matthew P. Wiener) writes:
>[...]                       There are no non-Lorentzian coordinate systems
>in a Lorentzian geometry.

I'm surprised to see you admit this!  You have been talking all along about
rotating 'frames' (which aren't Lorentzian).  Now, you have finally admitted
this to be inappropriate.  Bravo!

J. Giles
Los Alamos