Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!decvax!decwrl!glacier!well!ptsfa!gilbbs!mc68020
From: mc68020@gilbbs.UUCP (Tom Keller)
Newsgroups: net.politics
Subject: Re: That dirty 'ol CIA
Message-ID: <112@gilbbs.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 24-Mar-86 21:05:31 EST
Article-I.D.: gilbbs.112
Posted: Mon Mar 24 21:05:31 1986
Date-Received: Wed, 26-Mar-86 22:06:10 EST
References: <500@ssc-bee.UUCP> <2038@uwmacc.UUCP> <509@ssc-bee.UUCP>
Distribution: na
Organization: Gil's Place, Santa Rosa CA
Lines: 63

In article <509@ssc-bee.UUCP>, thill@ssc-bee.UUCP (Tom Hill) writes:
> > >
> > > [ stuff from me deleted ]
> > >
> > > Certainly there have been abuses but to dismantle such an important
> > > organization simply because of this is absurd.
> > 
> > 
> > The argument on the net has not been over their info gathering but over their
> > overt manipulation of other countries' affairs.  Have you been reading the
> > articles, or just the Subject lines?
> > 
> > jdm
> 
> If you had read the articles you would know that the suggestion was to get
> rid of the CIA because of these abuses.  Sorry about making a relevant
> comment, awfully silly of me.
> 
> I also don't see why everything on this net has to be an "argument." 
> Why can't we just discuss things?
> 

   Because, Tom, right-wing facist dupes like yourself keep putting forward all 
sorts of lies, misinformation and misrepresentations in order to support
the myth of the Great Communist Conspiracy!






















(doesn't feel so good, does it?  Don't like being called names, and being
told how stupid you are, do you?...well, that is what the supporters of the
administration continually do to anyone with the guts and intelligence to 
disagree publically.  ***THAT*** is why things here consistently wind up as
arguments, rather than discussions)

-- 

====================================

Disclaimer:  I hereby disclaim any and all responsibility for disclaimers.

tom keller
{ihnp4, dual}!ptsfa!gilbbs!mc68020

(* we may not be big, but we're small! *)