Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site kontron.UUCP Path: utzoo!lsuc!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!bellcore!decvax!decwrl!pyramid!voder!kontron!cramer From: cramer@kontron.UUCP (Clayton Cramer) Newsgroups: net.politics Subject: Re: In the Name of God Message-ID: <655@kontron.UUCP> Date: Wed, 26-Mar-86 13:09:58 EST Article-I.D.: kontron.655 Posted: Wed Mar 26 13:09:58 1986 Date-Received: Sat, 29-Mar-86 09:41:21 EST References: <1680@ihlpg.UUCP> <11000126@uiucdcsb> <60@gilbbs.UUCP> <641@mmm.UUCP> <108@gilbbs.UUCP> Organization: Kontron Electronics, Mt. View, CA Lines: 76 > > In article <600@kontron.UUCP> cramer@kontron.UUCP (Clayton Cramer) writes: > > >> of these places and volunteer to fight. Go on, join the Contras! > > > > > >That's illegal under U.S. law. > > > > It is? What law? What about all the Americans who joined the Canadian > > military and the RAF before the US was officially involved in WWII? What about > > all the American mercenaries around the world today? > > Going somewhere to fight does not necessarily mean renouncing the > > US - you don't have to join their army (and besides, the contras are not really > > connected to any foreign government), you just have to fight. > > > > Besides which, you neatly evaded the point by crying foul. You want the > Sandinistas whipped? You want to puch Kaddafi around? Go do it yourself, > you son of a bitch! Don't send the young men of our nation out to be killed > for your goddamned political/military masturbations!!!!!!! > > (you're goddamned right this is a direct, personal attack!) > 1. You assume that I support Reagan's policies in Central America. I do not. 2. You assume that I support sending U.S. troops into Central America. I do not. 3. Tom, you really need to READ BEFORE WRITING. It makes all the difference in the world. > > > > > >> I would also suggest that you folks should donate additionaly funds over and > > >> above your legal tax burden, tagged specifically to go tot the terrorists. > > >> *I* do not choose to support terrorism, regardless of the bullshit > > >> euphemisms you care to use to disguise it. > > >> > > > > > >Also illegal under U.S. law. > > > > > > > > Odd...it is exactly what the Reagan administration is encouraging wealthy > conservatives to do... > I oppose the law restricting the rights of Americans to donate time and labor to whatever cause they feel like. I would hope that would agree that this sort of activity should be private, not governmental. > > So just make a donation directly to the contras - that shouldn't > > be illegal. Besides, it would be rather inefficient to do it through the > > IRS anyway. > > I say, if you are going to support a war action, then you had better damned > well be willing to go put *YOUR* ass on the fucking line! I get sick and tired > of your hawk-coward assholes who always want to send someone else in to do your > dirty work!!!! > > > (flame me all you want for the personal attacks, the filthy language, the > bad grammar...I don't care..sometimes a thing just has to be said in the > way is **HAS** to be said!!!) > Actually, I'm going to flame you for the fact that you are a reactionary. You are operating very emotionally, and reacting to things that I don't believe in, and have never supported. Is it so difficult to read what people say before starting to blather? > tom keller Clayton E. Cramer "In or out of Central America, the foreplay is killing us."