Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site watrose.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!watnot!watrose!tohaapanen From: tohaapanen@watrose.UUCP (Tom Haapanen) Newsgroups: net.rec.photo Subject: Re: Canon T90: Has anyone used/heard about it? Message-ID: <7960@watrose.UUCP> Date: Wed, 26-Mar-86 20:40:17 EST Article-I.D.: watrose.7960 Posted: Wed Mar 26 20:40:17 1986 Date-Received: Thu, 27-Mar-86 01:34:29 EST References: <411@unirot.UUCP> Reply-To: tohaapanen@watrose.UUCP (Tom Haapanen) Organization: University of Waterloo, Ontario Lines: 49 Keywords: canon gjb@unirot.UUCP (Greg Brail) writes: > Also, this leads me to the inevitable question: Would you >recommend a T90 or an F-1? This depends, of course, on price, whether >or not the T90 has a real manual mode (I doubt it), and how well the >T90 is built. It also brings in the old superautomatic camera vs. >manual camera debate. Of course, I'll still have my FTb... The answer is, YES! Ummm, seriously, T90 is considerably less expensive than a New F-1, and in fact costs only a little bit more than a good used F-1 (old model) with a motor drive. Which is better? Well, let's see... T90 New F-1 (AE finder, AE motor drive) Program modes 7 - Auto modes (~flash) 2 2 Metering modes 3 3 (requires new focusing screens) Manual/stopdown Y/Y Y/Y (match-needle) Shutter speed range 30-1/4000 8-1/2000 (no half-stop speeds) Discount price (est.) $400 $650 In addition, T-90 has more flash modes, is lighter and has better ergonomics, and has a metal shutter. New F-1 will last forever and can be run over by a truck, can take averse conditions, has mechanical shutter speeds, has interchangeable viewfinders and a 100-exposure film chamber. I played with a T90 the other day, and I was sorely tempted until I found out the store wanted $649 (CDN) for just the body -- that's $465 US! Maybe I should wait for a bit longer and get an F-1 instead. Right now I have an FTb (does anybody out there have a real FT --- the FTb's predecessor?) and a T70, and I'm considering replacing the latter despite its rather short service, as neither camera can take a motor drive. :-( I consider the T90 to be a "semi-professional" camera, given the motor drive, focusing screens and so on. How do the rest of you people out there feel about these cameras? How long will a plastic body (such as T90, or any other T-series camera) last anyway? \tom haapanen / watrose!tohaapanen university of waterloo ..!watmath <-- watmum!tohaapanen \ watlion!tohaapanen I am one in ten, a number on a list I am one in ten, even though I don't exist No-body knows me, though I'm always there A statistical reminder of a world that doesn't care (c) UB40, 1981