Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site frog.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!cybvax0!frog!wjr
From: wjr@frog.UUCP (STella Calvert)
Newsgroups: net.rumor
Subject: Bring back net.bizarre!
Message-ID: <703@frog.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 25-Mar-86 01:54:17 EST
Article-I.D.: frog.703
Posted: Tue Mar 25 01:54:17 1986
Date-Received: Thu, 27-Mar-86 07:20:53 EST
References: <101@proper.UUCP> <12400012@uiucdcs> <805@k.cs.cmu.edu>
Reply-To: wjr@frog.UUCP (STella Calvert)
Organization: The Church of the Holy Starship
Lines: 25

In article <805@k.cs.cmu.edu> mcb@k.cs.cmu.edu (Michael Browne) writes:
>If everyone thinks that the purpose of mail.bizarre is to protect "innocent"
>newsgroups, I hereby disolve mail.bizarre.  On with the invasion of
>net.rumor!  Bizarroids of the world unite!  You have nothing to lose but
>your chains.  You have a newsgroup to win.

Problem with this is that it's more likely that the net.stuffies will
attempt to get rid of net.rumor.  Spread out!  There's lots of
newsgroups to demonstrate a volume of postings in -- why limit it to
one rmable group?

But hey, let's keep the amusement value up at the same time!

How many site administrators does it take to change a lightbulb?

Another vote for net.bizarre.again!

				STella Calvert

		Do what thou wilt -- not just a good idea, 

				it's the law!

Guest on Account:	...!mit-eddie!frog!wjr
Life:			Baltimore!AnnArbor!<LongStrangeTrip>!Taxachusetts
Future:			...	(!L5!TheBelt!InterstellarSpace)