Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 alpha 4/15/85; site weitek.UUCP
Path: utzoo!decvax!decwrl!turtlevax!weitek!robert
From: robert@weitek.UUCP (Robert Plamondon)
Newsgroups: net.rumor
Subject: Re: *FLAME* Re: Computer Horror Stories
Message-ID: <394@weitek.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 31-Mar-86 19:42:03 EST
Article-I.D.: weitek.394
Posted: Mon Mar 31 19:42:03 1986
Date-Received: Tue, 1-Apr-86 21:00:01 EST
References: <205@nbs-amrf.UUCP> <1865@teklds.UUCP> <2035@hao.UUCP>
Distribution: na
Organization: Weitek Corp. Sunnyvale Ca.
Lines: 31

In article <2035@hao.UUCP>, woods@hao.UUCP (Greg Woods) writes:
>   Yes, I agree. This is NOT net.bizarre, despite all the jerks who are not
> accepting the FACT that that group is no more, and USENET can no longer be
> net.post-whatever-you-feel-like, unless, of course, you'd like to
> pay my employer $25,000 a year so they can pay the phone bills to remain
> the local backbone? Fat chance. Just keep it up, and the next group to
> go here (and elsewhere) will be this one. Next, the net.terrorists (I 
> call them net.you-pay-for-MY-garbage) will ruin another group, and another,
> and soon there will be no more net. Have at it, assholes.
> 
> --Greg

I heard a rumor that the same people who are complaining about
non-rumors being posted to net.rumors are posting non-rumors to
net.rumors.  I've heard that such actions are generally regarded as
"hypocritical."

I heard another rumor that these same netters compound their
error by using wild statements and vulgar language.  According to the
rumor, this makes it very hard to tell the so-called malicious users
of the net from the so-called concerned users of the net.

Can anyone verify this?

-- 

	Robert Plamondon
	UUCP: {turtlevax, cae780}!weitek!robert
	FidoNet: 143/12 robert plamondon

	"How about a little fire, Scarecrow?"