Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site umich.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!epsilon!mb2c!umich!torek
From: torek@umich.UUCP (Paul V. Torek )
Newsgroups: net.sci,net.philosophy
Subject: Re: Prisoner's Dilemma
Message-ID: <538@umich.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 26-Mar-86 01:06:32 EST
Article-I.D.: umich.538
Posted: Wed Mar 26 01:06:32 1986
Date-Received: Thu, 27-Mar-86 07:19:33 EST
References: <12481@ucbvax.BERKEL <2007@brl-smoke.ARPA>
Reply-To: torek@zippy-de-do-dah.UUCP (Paul V. Torek )
Organization: University of Michigan, EECS Dept., Ann Arbor, MI
Lines: 11
Xref: watmath net.sci:650 net.philosophy:4694
Summary: GIGO

In article <2007@brl-smoke.ARPA> gwyn@brl.ARPA writes:
>Many years ago, Anatol Rapoport had a Scientific American article
>on games such as The Prisoner's Dilemma, in which he too tried to
>argue against the logical conclusion of basic game theory,

What conclusion is that, and what alternative did he propose?

Anticipatory hint:  what conclusions you draw depends on what premises
you start with...

--Paul Torek, really at					 torek@umich