Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!ittatc!dcdwest!sdcsvax!ucbvax!brahms!weemba From: weemba@brahms.BERKELEY.EDU (Matthew P. Wiener) Newsgroups: net.sci,net.legal,net.med Subject: Psychic Damages Message-ID: <12833@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU> Date: Mon, 31-Mar-86 21:35:34 EST Article-I.D.: ucbvax.12833 Posted: Mon Mar 31 21:35:34 1986 Date-Received: Wed, 2-Apr-86 08:17:39 EST Sender: usenet@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Reply-To: weemba@brahms.BERKELEY.EDU (Matthew P. Wiener) Organization: University of California, Berkeley Lines: 40 Xref: linus net.sci:398 net.legal:2916 net.med:3526 The following story is reprinted (without permission) in its entirety from the 29 March 1986 _San Francisco Chronicle_. ------------------------------------------------------------ PSYCHIC WINS DAMAGE AWARD FOR CAT SCAN Philadelphia A woman who sued her hospital and doctor on allegations that their treatment destroyed her psychic powers has been awarded more than $1 million in damages, bu a "shocked" hospital attorney said yesterday that he will appeal the verdict. Judith Richardson Haimes, 42, of Clearwater, Fla., contended that as a result of a CAT scan, she suffered severe headaches when she tried to concentrate to use her psychic powers. Her attorney, Joel Lieberman, said Haimes had earned her living as a psychic and had been able to read people's auras and help police solve crimes. A jury deliberated about 45 minutes Thursday before awarding Haimes $600,000, plus $418,000 in delay damages. She was undergoing diagnosis for brain tumors at Temple University Hospital in 1976. "If the verdict is allowed to stand, it's an outrage and an example of why the American tort system has to be changed," said Richard Galli, an attorney for Temple University Hospital, where the CAT scan was performed. After the jury heard Haimes' case, Court of Common Pleas Judge Leon Katz ordered the jury to disregard Haimes' allegations about her lost psychic powers and to consider only her testimony about the negative allergic reaction she suffered from a dye injected during the CAT scan. Galli said the jury either did not listen to the judge's instructions, did not understand them or disregarded them in reaching its verdict. "I was shocked," Galli said. "There's no basis for it." United Press ucbvax!brahms!weemba Matthew P Wiener/UCB Math Dept/Berkeley CA 94720