Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/5/84; site mtx5a.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxn!ihnp4!houxm!whuxl!whuxlm!akgua!akguc!mtunh!mtuni!mtune!mtunf!mtx5c!mtx5d!mtx5a!mat From: mat@mtx5a.UUCP (m.terribile) Newsgroups: net.philosophy,net.sci,net.jokes.d,net.women,net.nlang Subject: Re: Satire for the masses Message-ID: <1261@mtx5a.UUCP> Date: Thu, 27-Mar-86 03:02:45 EST Article-I.D.: mtx5a.1261 Posted: Thu Mar 27 03:02:45 1986 Date-Received: Sat, 5-Apr-86 12:09:28 EST References: <435@ccivax.UUCP> <13400007@uiucdcsp> <12239@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU> <358@unirot.UUCP> <640@mmm.UUCP> <12562@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU> Organization: AT&T Information Systems, Middletown, NJ 07748-4801. Lines: 26 Xref: watmath net.philosophy:4913 net.sci:700 net.jokes.d:1647 net.women:9989 net.nlang:4382 > A lot of people seem to be having trouble recognizing satire. . . . > >but the lack of smiley faces and the poor spelling may indeed indicate that > >he was serious. . . . > Lesson #1: SMILEY FACES DO NOT MAKE FOR GOOD SATIRE. Ever. Sorry, weemba, the problem is not with good satire. Art Buchwald and Andy Rooney write good satire and humor. They don't need to use smiley faces. Their articles smile for them. Few of us command the language with such authority. Our articles are free with words but reluctant to give the reader any facial expression at all. This is bad, because it means that our bad satire is taken as non-satire. And THIS is very bad. Very, very bad because it can cause some awful hurt feelings. Did you see the ``We're out to get you, Cheryl'' article? Satire MUST be read as satire, even if it is not written as satire. Hence the need for the smiley. If you can write satire with the sick leer of a Buchwald, you have my permission to omit the smiley and save net bandwidth. :-) -- from Mole End Mark Terribile (scrape .. dig ) mtx5b!mat (Please mail to mtx5b!mat, NOT mtx5a! mat, or to mtx5a!mtx5b!mat) ,.. .,, ,,, ..,***_*.