Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: Notesfiles $Revision: 1.7.0.10 $; site ism780
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!epsilon!zeta!sabre!petrus!bellcore!decvax!ittatc!dcdwest!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!ism780c!ism780!jimb
From: jimb@ism780
Newsgroups: net.singles
Subject: Re: Win/Win Players vs. Win/Lose Pl
Message-ID: <62800006@ism780>
Date: Mon, 24-Mar-86 14:38:00 EST
Article-I.D.: ism780.62800006
Posted: Mon Mar 24 14:38:00 1986
Date-Received: Wed, 26-Mar-86 06:46:28 EST
References: <548@dsi1.UUCP>
Lines: 23
Nf-ID: #R:dsi1.UUCP:548:ism780:62800006:000:860
Nf-From: ism780!jimb    Mar 24 11:38:00 1986



> The Win/Lose player says, "I have to win even if I'm wrong."  The Win/Win
> says, "We both have to win even if one of us is wrong."  It seems to me
> that both types of players are telling a lot of lies.
>
> Lee

I think you're missing the point in that an awful lot of situations "right"
and "wrong" depend purely on perception -- a sort of quantum view of
psychosociology -- and as such, two not-equivalent statements can still be
true.  Now, ideologists of all stripes and flavors, from John Birchers to
religious fundamentalists to the theoreticians of the Soviet Communist Party
can and do deny this, clamoring in unison, "There is but one way!"

		      -- from the musings of an ideological moderate,
			 Jim Brunet

			 "Me? I'm just looking for Schrodinger's cat."

			 ihnp4/ima/ism780
			 hplabs/hao/ico/ism780
			 sdcsvax/sdcrdcf/ism780C/ism780