Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: Version 1.0 Netnews CMS/BITNET 5/19/85; site PSUVM.BITNET
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ukma!psuvm.bitnet!miq
From: MIQ@PSUVMA.BITNET
Newsgroups: net.startrek
Subject: Re: Did we like the first movie?
Message-ID: <4653MIQ@PSUVMA>
Date: Thu, 27-Mar-86 14:18:28 EST
Article-I.D.: PSUVMA.4653MIQ
Posted: Thu Mar 27 14:18:28 1986
Date-Received: Sat, 29-Mar-86 01:00:52 EST
References: <65@utecfc.UUCP> <755@ihwpt.UUCP> <645@riccb.UUCP> <1911@trwrba.UUCP> <1908@cbosgd.UUCP> <279@bucsd.UUCP> <2384@utcsri.U
Lines: 32

In article <2384@utcsri.UUCP> tom@utcsri.UUCP (Tom Nadas) says:
>
>I rate the movies in the following descending order of
>preference:
>
>STAR TREK--THE MOTION PICTURE
>STAR TREK II--THE WRATH OF KHAN
>GODZILLA 1985  :-)
>STAR TREK III--SPOCK'S BRAIN (re-make)
>
     
     Okay, I'll put in my two credits.  Also in descending order of
preference:
     
Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan
Star Trek III: The Search for Spock
Heaven's Gate
Star Trek: The Motionless Picture  (Where Nomad has gone before)
     
     I haven't seen the Special Edition of ST:TMP.  From what I've heard about
the restored scenes though, it'd be rated a very close third behind ST III.
(Or maybe second.  It's tough to say when you've only read about it.)
-------
                                               ------------------
James D. Maloy                                 |   THIS SPACE   |
The Pennsylvania State University              |    FOR RENT    |
UUCP Path: ihnp4!psuvax1!psuvma.bitnet!miq     |  Call 555-1723 |
                                               ------------------
     "I am pleased to see we have differences.  May we together become
 greater than the sum of both of us."
                                           -- Surak of Vulcan