Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!mhuxr!mhuxn!ihnp4!qantel!lll-lcc!lll-crg!seismo!rochester!bullwinkle!uw-beaver!uw-june!entropy!fetrow From: fetrow@entropy.UUCP (David Fetrow) Newsgroups: net.sci,net.bio Subject: Re: Acid rain damage query Message-ID: <284@entropy.UUCP> Date: Sun, 27-Apr-86 23:51:07 EDT Article-I.D.: entropy.284 Posted: Sun Apr 27 23:51:07 1986 Date-Received: Fri, 2-May-86 08:03:51 EDT References: <202@brl-smoke.ARPA> Reply-To: fetrow@entropy.UUCP (David Fetrow) Distribution: net Organization: UW MathStat, Seattle Lines: 33 Xref: watmath net.sci:771 net.bio:422 =====> Begin 202's article <===== Yet, even though acidic, this area teems (Okee. Swamp) with life. Are the lakes damaged by acid rain more acidic than this swamp water? If not, is it just because they are in colder climates that the (seemingly) acid-tolerating lifeforms that flourish in the acid swamp cannot live in these more-northerly acidified lakes? Or could such acid-tolerating biota be introduced into those lakes and create a new ecosystem that could survive the acidification? (And that this would happen naturally, given long enough time, but these areas are sterile now just because the acid-tolerating biota haven't yet been introduced?) =====> End 202s article <======= An interesting observation. I'd expect most of the acid tolerating biota would have a problem with the temperature (and possibly altitude) of Northern acid damaged lakes. Northern bog biota might be a better choice. In any case, introducing new species into the wild is an EXTREMELY risky proposition. Often the response is either totally non-successful or overwhelming. As a last resort the idea might work but it is not something to be done lightly. -- - Dave "Tuttle" Fetrow Defender of CP/M-80 in a multibyte world { ihnp4, fluke, tektronix }!uw-beaver!entropy!fetrow :UUCP entropy!fetrow@uw-june.arpa :ARPA fetrow@UWALOCKE,7833117@UWAVM :BITNET 74175,1724 :Compuserve ...and a whole pile of other stuff