Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!harvard!seismo!lll-crg!lll-lcc!well!pan
From: pan@well.UUCP (Philip Nicholls)
Newsgroups: net.bio
Subject: Re: Orphaned Response
Message-ID: <1131@well.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 21-May-86 02:34:08 EDT
Article-I.D.: well.1131
Posted: Wed May 21 02:34:08 1986
Date-Received: Sat, 24-May-86 02:26:13 EDT
References: <311@dg_rtp> <1188@umcp-cs> <1190@psivax.UUCP>
Reply-To: pan@well.UUCP (Philip Nicholls)
Organization: Whole Earth Lectronic Link, Sausalito CA
Lines: 9
Keywords: punctuated evolution/equilibrium


   It has been a while since I kept abreast of newly breaking
ideas in evolutionary theory.  I do not recall a "punctuated 
evolution ", but do recall a "punctuated equilibrium", which, 
at the time, I thought made alot of sense.  If these two ideas
are one and the same, I would like someone to present the
sources of counter-evidense.
   So far, much of the discussion of goal oriented evolution
sounds neo-Lamarkian to me.