Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 alpha 4/3/85; site ukma.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ukma!drew
From: drew@ukma.UUCP (Andrew Lawson)
Newsgroups: net.astro,net.bio,net.singles,net.social,net.women,net.med,net.philosophy,net.religion
Subject: Re: PSI:  Yes I see it / No you don't
Message-ID: <3508@ukma.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 25-May-86 15:22:59 EDT
Article-I.D.: ukma.3508
Posted: Sun May 25 15:22:59 1986
Date-Received: Mon, 26-May-86 06:40:59 EDT
References: <8300@kestrel.ARPA>
Reply-To: drew@ukma.UUCP (Andrew Lawson)
Organization: U of KY Mathematical Sciences
Lines: 18
Xref: watmath net.astro:1765 net.bio:529 net.singles:12793 net.social:1095 net.women:10562 net.med:4027 net.philosophy:5499 net.religion:10247

In article <8300@kestrel.ARPA> king@kestrel.ARPA (Dick King) writes:
>   From: sunny@hoptoad.uucp (Sunny Kirsten)
>
>One question to those who claim the existence of psychicic phenomena:
>
>Evolution theory predicts that if it exists and is useful it would be
>the norm as those with the ability would outbreed those without.
>
This presuposes that everything about humans is explained by evolution,
which is to say that all that we are is essentially genetic.  Perhaps
the ability (or more likely the awareness of the ability) to perform
psychic acts is developmental/environmental and not genetic.

-- 
Drew Lawson
					cbosgd!ukma!drew
"Parts is parts."			drew@uky.csnet
					drew@UKMA.BITNET