Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!harvard!seismo!decuac!avolio
From: avolio@decuac.DEC.COM (Frederick M. Avolio)
Newsgroups: net.bugs.uucp
Subject: Re: ULTRIX uucp vs. 4.3bsd (and others)
Message-ID: <936@decuac.DEC.COM>
Date: Wed, 21-May-86 23:53:59 EDT
Article-I.D.: decuac.936
Posted: Wed May 21 23:53:59 1986
Date-Received: Sat, 24-May-86 04:25:43 EDT
References: <4938@topaz.RUTGERS.EDU> <391@ektools.UUCP> <4971@topaz.RUTGERS.EDU>
Distribution: net
Organization: ULTRIX Applications Center, MD
Lines: 18
Keywords: parity

In article <4971@topaz.RUTGERS.EDU>, rubin@topaz.RUTGERS.EDU (Mike Rubin) writes:
> We're also running Ultrix-32 1.1 on a VAX-750; from the replies on the
> net I am beginning to suspect our modems (Microcom's) are munging something
> ... Wasn't there traffic on the net a while back describing some uucp problem
> between Ultrix and 4.3?

Look, for the record...  We run Ultrix-32 V1.2.  We ran V1.1 and V1.0.
Ran all the field test versions in between.  We talk to System V
systems, 4.2BSD systems, 4.1C systems, V7 systems, 4.3 systems, and
System III systems.  We talk to Goulds, Pyramids, other VAXes, Wicats
(at a time), and a 3B-something.  We don't have problems with UUCP to
any of them.  The same can be said for DECVAX, a usenet backbone site.
Why DECVAX even talks to european systems! :-)

-- 
Fred @ DEC Ultrix Applications Center
INET: avolio@decuac.DEC.COM				* Fight the Fight *
UUCP: {decvax,seismo,cbosgd}!decuac!avolio	       * Rescue the Unborn *