Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site sri-spam.ARPA
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!ucbvax!nike!sri-spam!robert
From: robert@sri-spam.ARPA (Robert Allen)
Newsgroups: net.followup
Subject: Re: Re: Libyan Air-raid/ open letter to
Message-ID: <5633@sri-spam.ARPA>
Date: Fri, 25-Apr-86 18:15:46 EDT
Article-I.D.: sri-spam.5633
Posted: Fri Apr 25 18:15:46 1986
Date-Received: Sun, 27-Apr-86 06:17:34 EDT
References: <538@imsvax.UUCP> <8300002@unido.UUCP> <127@paisley.ac.uk>
Organization: SRI International, Menlo Park, CA
Lines: 19

In article <127@paisley.ac.uk>, andrew@cs.paisley.ac.uk (Andrew Fleming) writes:
> I think you've hit the nail right on the head, I wonder if the 
> American would have attacked if they were a lot closer to Libya,
> we in Europe will undoubtly suffer the consequences of Reagan's
> action.

Perhaps I'm wrong, but I think that Khadafy was lucky that we
don't live closer to Libya.  Because if we had, and had suffered
more terrorism as a result, we would probably have done a more
thorough job of the bombing to prevent any retaliation.  I know
that I sure would.

				Robert Allen,

				robert@sri-spam.ARPA

Disclaimer: 
"These ideas are obviously my own, do you think anyone else thinks thi
 way?"