Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!lsuc!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!bellcore!decvax!decwrl!pyramid!hplabs!parcvax!bane From: bane@parcvax.UUCP Newsgroups: net.followup,net.politics Subject: Re: Air raid on Libya and TV coverage Message-ID: <295@parcvax.Xerox.COM> Date: Fri, 2-May-86 02:04:59 EDT Article-I.D.: parcvax.295 Posted: Fri May 2 02:04:59 1986 Date-Received: Sat, 3-May-86 21:18:43 EDT References: <7404@cca.UUCP> <13360@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU> Organization: Xerox PARC Lines: 23 Xref: lsuc net.followup:1857 net.politics:5108 Well, the raid happened. What is the result? It had SOME effect: on "All Things considered" (or was it "Morning Edition) I heard that suddenly translators were being corrected: "Oh, no, we didn't mean 'liquidate American influence', liquidate means kill; we meant 'remove'." The news story said that apparently khadaffi's coalition (and I thought he ruled by himself!) was trying to tone him down. On the other hand, days after I heard that, I heard that terrorism was being increased, perhaps testing Reagan to see if he will follow through on his commitment to militarily oppose terrorism. Whether or not it was the right thing to do, one thing is certain: the raid will be worse than useless if not followed up. We've already shown our willingness to use military force against terrorism (or, we've already lowered ourselves to the terrorists level); to change our tactics now would say, "well, we didn't REALLY mean it", which prompts sneers from the terrorists, and won't convince anyone who thought the bombing raid was a horrible thing. - rene -- Rene P S (nee Steiner) Bane bane@parcvax