Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!bellcore!decvax!ittatc!dcdwest!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!hplabs!hpda!hpisoa2!hpitg!mmm!mkr@mmm
From: mkr@mmm
Newsgroups: net.followup
Subject: Re: Re: Air raid on Libya
Message-ID: <775@mmm>
Date: Tue, 29-Apr-86 21:17:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: mmm.775
Posted: Tue Apr 29 21:17:00 1986
Date-Received: Sun, 11-May-86 16:14:54 EDT
References: <720@ark>
Lines: 22

In article <312@daemen.uucp> fox@daemen.uucp (Merlin) writes:
>   As for the similiar methods, $%^*@&!!!, we did not use car bombs, bombs 
>in airports, submachine guns in public places, and we did not attack libya 
>to get attention we did it to protect ourselves.   I for one would like to 
>travel abroad without having to worry about being blown to hell in some airport,
>anywhere!
>
>                                   David Fox
>

	Aside from which, the people living next to the military targets
at least have the option of *moving*, so they won't be in the strike
zone. But Qaddaffi's "strike zone" is the whole western world (well, Europe
and the Mideast, anyway), and *those* civilians don't have the opportunity
to avoid being in a war zone. Comparing an attack on military targets to
gunning down people in an airport is absurd - laughable if it weren't so 
sad.


					--MKR
"There's nothing wrong with shooting, as long as the right people get shot."
					-"Dirty" Harry Callahan