Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!gamma!epsilon!zeta!sabre!petrus!bellcore!decvax!decwrl!glacier!kestrel!ladkin
From: ladkin@kestrel.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.followup,net.politics
Subject: Re: Air raid on Libya
Message-ID: <7901@kestrel.ARPA>
Date: Mon, 12-May-86 15:48:36 EDT
Article-I.D.: kestrel.7901
Posted: Mon May 12 15:48:36 1986
Date-Received: Wed, 14-May-86 21:45:40 EDT
References: <157@unido.UUCP> <720@ark.UUCP> <122@paisley.ac.uk> <755@kontron.UUCP> <778@kontron.UUCP>
Organization: Kestrel Institute, Palo Alto, CA
Lines: 17
Xref: watmath net.followup:6271 net.politics:15880

In article <778@kontron.UUCP>, cramer@kontron.UUCP (Clayton Cramer) writes:
*     [...] but a 
*     Labour Party government in England at this point can't 
*     be distinguished from a Communist government by any
*     reasonable measure.

He backs this up with the following evidence:

> Didn't the last Labour Party platform include declaring Britain a nuclear-
> free zone?  Removal of US bases from Britain?  How long do you think 
> Britain would remain in NATO if the Labour Party won the next election?

I guess what he means by "Communist" is different from what
anyone else means by the word. Or is this merely a
non-sequitur, do you think?

Peter Ladkin