Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!harvard!seismo!mcvax!ukc!dcl-cs!strath-cs!jim
From: jim@cs.strath.ac.uk (Jim Reid)
Newsgroups: net.followup,net.politics
Subject: Is the UK Labour Party a Commie Threat?
Message-ID: <126@stracs.cs.strath.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 12-May-86 07:19:20 EDT
Article-I.D.: stracs.126
Posted: Mon May 12 07:19:20 1986
Date-Received: Thu, 15-May-86 05:51:03 EDT
References: <157@unido.UUCP> <720@ark.UUCP> <122@paisley.ac.uk> <755@kontron.UUCP> <1144@eagle.ukc.ac.uk> <778@kontron.UUCP>
Reply-To: jim@cs.strath.ac.uk (Jim Reid)
Organization: Department of Computer Science at Strathclyde University, UK.
Lines: 14
Xref: linus net.followup:5321 net.politics:15113

In article <778@kontron.UUCP> cramer@kontron.UUCP writes:

>Didn't the last Labour Party platform include declaring Britain a nuclear-
>free zone?  Removal of US bases from Britain?  How long do you think 
>Britain would remain in NATO if the Labour Party won the next election?

If that makes the Labour Party "communist" in your eyes, then I suppose other
Western nations like Switzerland, Sweden, New Zealand and Australia are also
communist too. They aren't too keen on storing other people's nuclear weapons
for them either. Mind you, the USSR is quite keen on deploying its nukes in
its satellite nations and isn't unfond of keeping USSR troops in Eastern Europe
etc. [I don't think they're all that keen on US bases either...:-)] 

		Jim