Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!mcvax!ukc!warwick!rlvd!kgd
From: kgd@rlvd.UUCP (Keith Dancey)
Newsgroups: net.followup
Subject: Re: Re: Air raid on Libya
Message-ID: <1329@rlvd.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 16-May-86 08:02:12 EDT
Article-I.D.: rlvd.1329
Posted: Fri May 16 08:02:12 1986
Date-Received: Fri, 23-May-86 22:41:53 EDT
References: <720@ark> <505@bu-cs>
Reply-To: kgd@rlvd.UUCP (Keith Dancey)
Organization: Rutherford Appleton Laboratories, Atlas Buildings, U.K.
Lines: 17

In article <505@bu-cs> dml%bu-cs@bu-cs.UUCP writes:
>
> ...  I'm quite sure that any federal judge would be more than
>willing to shut them (NORAID) down, given necessary proof ...  
 
You may well be 'sure' but you are wrong.  Try finding out why the US
courts back NORAID whenever litigations take place, it might even be
something to do with jurisdiction.
 
I find this concern over legal niceties rather touching, especially when 
it comes with a defence of bombing Libya.
-- 
Keith Dancey,                                UUCP:   ..!mcvax!ukc!rlvd!kgd
Rutherford Appleton Laboratory,
Chilton, Didcot, Oxon  OX11 0QX             
                                            JANET:       K.DANCEY@uk.ac.rl
Tel: (0235) 21900   ext 5716