Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!harvard!husc6!panda!genrad!mit-eddie!jbs
From: jbs@mit-eddie.MIT.EDU (Jeff Siegal)
Newsgroups: net.info-terms,net.internat
Subject: Re: In search of a sane keyboard standard
Message-ID: <1964@mit-eddie.MIT.EDU>
Date: Tue, 13-May-86 16:21:26 EDT
Article-I.D.: mit-eddi.1964
Posted: Tue May 13 16:21:26 1986
Date-Received: Thu, 15-May-86 05:43:40 EDT
References: <2071@cbosgd.UUCP> <1314@oddjob.UUCP> <132@sphinx.UChicago.UUCP> <1316@oddjob.UUCP> <273@valid.UUCP>
Reply-To: jbs@mit-eddie.UUCP (Jeff Siegal)
Organization: MIT, EE/CS Computer Facilities, Cambridge, MA
Lines: 11
Xref: linus net.info-terms:475 net.internat:38

In article <273@valid.UUCP> pete@valid.UUCP (Pete Zakel) writes:
>Also, there is no reason NOT to have a shifted '.' and ',' be something
>different on a terminal keyboard.  The reason for '. .' and ', ,' was that
>you still wanted to be able to type those in "shift lock" mode, but since
>"caps lock" on a terminal only shifts the alphabetic keys, the reason for
>a '. .' and ', ,' go away.  Some people just don't know how to think!

Nope.  On a VT220, the user can select CAPS-LOCK or SHIFT-LOCK in the
setup mode, depending on his/her preference.

Jeff Siegal