Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!genrad!decvax!decwrl!pyramid!pesnta!hplabs!qantel!lll-lcc!lll-crg!seismo!ll-xn!cit-vax!trent
From: trent@cit-vax.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.lang.c
Subject: Re: unary +
Message-ID: <408@cit-vax.Caltech.Edu>
Date: Tue, 22-Apr-86 22:15:47 EST
Article-I.D.: cit-vax.408
Posted: Tue Apr 22 22:15:47 1986
Date-Received: Sat, 26-Apr-86 06:03:57 EST
References: <2323@brl-smoke.ARPA> <687@bentley.UUCP> <951@dataioDataio.UUCP> <730@bentley.UUCP>
Reply-To: trent@cit-vax.UUCP (Ray Trent)
Organization: California Institute of Technology
Lines: 22

Organization : California Institute of Technology
Keywords: 


[this space for rent]

Has anyone considered a construct such as:

#forceorder <expr>

to signal the compiler that you really want the expression 
evaluated as the parens in the statement specify?

I don't see why you should have to use a completely new
construct (like a unary +) to give instructions to the compiler.
We already know how to do that.

Any thoughts?
-- 
					../ray\..
				(trent@csvax.caltech.edu)
"The above is someone else's opinion only at great coincidence"