Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!clyde!burl!ulysses!allegra!mit-eddie!genrad!decvax!ittatc!dcdwest!sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!hplabs!hpda!hpisoa2!hpitg!brl-smoke!ARPA@brl-smoke
From: ARPA@brl-smoke
Newsgroups: net.lang.c
Subject: Re: Infinite Loops
Message-ID: <321@brl-smoke>
Date: Mon, 28-Apr-86 05:00:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: brl-smok.321
Posted: Mon Apr 28 05:00:00 1986
Date-Received: Tue, 13-May-86 01:15:33 EDT
References: <8200004@ztivax>
Lines: 2

Actually, any decent C compiler will optimize away "while(1)",
so that it will be no less efficient than "for(;;)".