Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.2 9/18/84; site watdragon.UUCP
Path: utzoo!watmath!watnot!watdragon!jsgray
From: jsgray@watdragon.UUCP (Jan Gray)
Newsgroups: net.micro.16k
Subject: Re: Re: National's 32332
Message-ID: <1018@watdragon.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 25-May-86 11:07:33 EDT
Article-I.D.: watdrago.1018
Posted: Sun May 25 11:07:33 1986
Date-Received: Mon, 26-May-86 01:47:20 EDT
References: <746@usl.UUCP> <253@spar.UUCP> <2793@sdcrdcf.UUCP> <1768@gitpyr.UUCP> <2020@hammer.UUCP> <216@motsj1.UUCP> <2815@sdcrdcf.UUCP>
Reply-To: jsgray@watdragon.UUCP (Jan Gray)
Distribution: na
Organization: U of Waterloo, Ontario
Lines: 24
Summary: 

In article <2815@sdcrdcf.UUCP> doon@sdcrdcf.UUCP (Harry W. Reed) writes:
>In article <216@motsj1.UUCP> kjm@motsj1.UUCP (Kevin Meyer) writes:
>>> 
>>> I know someone who did benchmarks comparing the 32332 to the 68020,
>>> with all else being identical (RAM, etc).  A 15MHz 32332 is faster
>>> than a 16MHz 68020.
>>> 
>>Shouldn't this be posted to net.rumor?
>
>No, net.fact!

Could you tell us why the 332 is so fast, what the benchmarks test, schedule
for general availability of the 15 MHz version, etc.

Motorola announced 20 MHz fully debugged 68020s a while ago.  Are they
selling 24 MHz versions yet?  How does the {best generally available or
best internal sample} 68020 compare with the 32332?


Cheering for another commercially viable 32 bit family, trying to stir
up the 68K vs 32K debate yet again, and fickle as hell (I used to *love*
the NS family, but the bugs and the 68020 changed my mind),

Jan Gray    jsgray@watdragon    University of Waterloo    519-885-1211 x3870