Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!seismo!rochester!rocksanne!sunybcs!kitty!baylor!peter From: peter@baylor.UUCP (Peter da Silva) Newsgroups: net.micro.amiga Subject: Re: Re: Re: AmigaDos... Message-ID: <654@baylor.UUCP> Date: Thu, 15-May-86 03:01:22 EDT Article-I.D.: baylor.654 Posted: Thu May 15 03:01:22 1986 Date-Received: Sun, 18-May-86 12:28:29 EDT References: <1076@h-sc1.UUCP> <160@cbmvax.cbmvax.cbm.UUCP> <636@baylor.UUCP> <1134@amiga.amiga.UUCP> Distribution: net Organization: The Power Elite, Houston, TX Lines: 42 > In article <636@baylor.UUCP> peter@baylor.UUCP (Peter da Silva) writes: > >> Cheap directories are important on a small-disk machine. And at least this > >> method allows for essentially unlimited directory sizes, unlike other DOS > >> systems popular on microcomputers today. > > > >I don't know of any DOS that doesn't allow unlimited directory sizes, [...] > Apple-][ DOS (not Prodos), TRS-DOS, CP/M, MS-DOS (setable, but finite) OK, I don't know any serious DOS that allows (not even supports) multitasking that doesn't allow infinite directory sizes. MS-DOS directories, other than the root directory, can grow like any other file to any size you want. The other DOS-es you mention are jokes... (so is MS-DOS, really). The real competitors of AmigaDOS, and what you should be comparing it with, are the likes of UNIX and OS/9. And UNIX directories are just as cheap as yours. As any number of people have mentioned: you have to put the file name *somewhere*. > >I do think that giving each icon a seperate file is a mistake, since it makes > >folder displays unbearable slow. Why not do what the Integrated Solutions > >system does (more or less) and put all the icons in a folder in a single file > >in that directory? > One reason might be that you could not just use CLI file copies > to move your files arround. The copy program(s) would have to keep track > of and update (insert, change, delete) the Icon file for every file copy. They have to keep track of the .info files, don't they? You mean you have to go back & move the .info files as well? And then change them with your .info editor if you changed the file name? Hey... the Amiga is a great machine, and I lust after it. I just think that there are several places in the system where you didn't really look at the wealth of existing solutions to a problem like "how do I find a file" before doing it your own way. Since the O/S interface and implementation seem to be fairly loosely coupled it should be possible to change things like this without breaking existing software. So why not just fix it and have done with it, instead of making excuses? Just putting the filename in the directory should do wonders for the speed of icon display... -- -- Peter da Silva -- UUCP: ...!shell!{baylor,graffiti}!peter; MCI: PDASILVA; CIS: 70216,1076